Top News

54

New Delhi:

Sections of the United States foreign policy establishment have privately expressed reservations over President Donald Trump’s sustained outreach towards Pakistan and its military leadership, with some officials arguing internally that the current approach may not represent a durable long-term strategic shift in Washington’s South Asia posture, according to people familiar with the discussions.

The conversations, described by sources as informal internal deliberations rather than an organised policy review, reflect concern among some officials that the current trajectory risks creating uncertainty in Washington’s approach towards India and broader regional alignment.

According to people with knowledge of these discussions, some officials privately assessed that elements of the present engagement with Pakistan may not necessarily survive beyond Trump’s presidency and will be subjected to reassessment under a future administration.

The discussions, sources indicated, reflected political and institutional assessments about policy continuity rather than any formal transition planning.

The concerns extend beyond the immediate question of engagement with Pakistan and into a wider debate over what factors are shaping decision-making within the administration.

Some officials privately argued that lobbying activity, the President’s personal worldview, and broader commercial and political calculations appeared to be exerting greater influence than what they viewed as conventional strategic considerations relating to India.

Central to Pakistan’s repositioning was a deliberate transactional pitch to the Trump administration. Pakistani officials offered access to what they described as massive oil reserves and critical minerals essential for American defence industries, with US Strategic Metals signing a memorandum of understanding with Pakistan’s Frontier Works Organization for critical minerals production in September 2025. Officials familiar with internal discussions said this deal-focused approach was calibrated to Trump’s known preferences.

Trump’s two high-profile meetings with Pakistan’s Army Chief, Asim Munir, at the White House within a span of three months have also drawn significant attention and raised questions about the real motives behind the growing engagement.

Some officials privately noted that the pace and visibility of that access was disproportionate to what conventional strategic assessments of the relationship would have warranted.

In the year since Operation Sindoor, officials in Washington have grown increasingly worried about Islamabad’s close ties with Trump, arguing that his warm relationship with Pakistan gives Islamabad diplomatic cover it did not previously have, complicating India’s strategic calculations.

Analysts have noted that the current moment represents a temporary end to the India-first posture that had defined Washington’s South Asia approach.

However, the reading that Washington has increased its dealings with India for its own long-term benefits, both economic and strategic, has not been lost on officials in New Delhi.