Top News

Split-second detail proved decisive: Why Kylian Mbappe’s penalty against Real Betis was not retaken despite Marc Bartra moving into the box early

Real Madrid suffered their first defeat of the season in a dramatic meeting with Real Betis at La Cartuja, but the main talking point after the final whistle centred on one contentious refereeing moment. Even though there were claims that Marc Bartra had encroached before Kylian Mbappe took his late penalty, the officials were right to stick with the decision not to order a retake.

The controversial penalty incident at La Cartuja

The final moments of Real Madrid’s match against Real Betis were packed with drama when Alejandro Jose Hernandez Hernandez awarded a penalty in the 93rd minute. After Vinicius Junior was fouled, Mbappe stepped up with an opportunity to salvage a point for Jose Mourinho’s side. But the France star saw his effort saved by Alvaro Valles, who completed an outstanding individual display.

Right after the save, protests came from the Madrid bench as well as supporters, with Marc Bartra seeming to have entered the penalty area before the ball was kicked.

Replays confirmed that Bartra was indeed the first player to break the line of the box, and he was also the player who eventually cleared the ball for a corner following Valles’ initial save. Under standard FIFA laws, if a defender encroaches and the penalty is missed, the kick should be retaken if that same player then affects the next phase of play. However, a technical detail involving the exact position of Bartra’s feet at the moment of contact became the key point in the VAR check.

Why the rules worked in Marc Bartra’s favour

The main reason the penalty was not retaken came down to a split-second physical detail. Although Bartra had launched himself forward in anticipation of a rebound, his feet had not actually made contact with the turf inside the penalty area at the exact instant Mbappe struck the ball.

In simple terms, the experienced defender was in mid-air, leaning into the box but not yet planted inside it. That difference is crucial in the current interpretation of the laws, because encroachment is generally judged by where a player is in contact with the playing surface, rather than by the angle of the body leaning forward.

By being “crafty” and timing his jump perfectly, Bartra was able to gain a major positional advantage without technically infringing the laws of the game. That enabled him to get to the loose ball first after Valles pushed the shot away, denying Mbappe any chance of a follow-up attempt.

Real Madrid left frustrated by VAR calls

This penalty controversy was not the only occasion on which the video assistant referee had a major influence on the contest. Earlier in the night, the visitors believed they had found a route back into the game through substitute Carlos Espi.

The young attacker, who had come on in place of Federico Valverde, produced a brilliant moment just five minutes after entering the match. But technology ruled out Espi’s excellent finish because of a marginal offside in the build-up, adding further frustration for Mourinho’s team.

End of Mourinho’s winning run

The loss brought an important halt to the momentum of a Real Madrid side that had looked highly impressive beforehand. At La Cartuja, Los Blancos controlled long spells of possession, but they could not show the necessary cutting edge in the final third.

The outcome was Real Madrid’s first official defeat of the season and brought to an end a run of three straight La Liga wins. The timing is far from ideal, with the club set to begin their Champions League campaign next Tuesday. Mourinho’s tactical calls, including the unexpected decision to leave Bernardo Silva out of the starting XI for the second consecutive match, are likely to face close examination from the Spanish media over the coming days as the team tries to respond to this setback.