Top News

Time is catching up: Postecoglou’s bold call leaves Cristiano Ronaldo facing the difficult question

From Houston to Dammam: has the Portuguese superstar lost the protection he once seemed to enjoy?

Cristiano Ronaldo’s half-time substitution in Al-Nassr’s meeting with Al-Ettifaq was far more than a routine tactical adjustment. With his team needing a way back into the game, Ange Postecoglou removed Al-Nassr’s captain and introduced fresh energy in an attempt to regain balance and spark a comeback. In doing so, he reopened a question that for years had almost been untouchable: has time finally started to impose its rules on Ronaldo?

Dammam brought back memories of Houston less than two months earlier, when Ronaldo began his 2026 World Cup campaign against the Democratic Republic of the Congo. He left almost none of his usual mark on that match. There was no goal, only around 20 touches and three attempts that failed to find the net.

That game alone did not tell the full story. But the figures at the time made the issue clear: since scoring a penalty against Ghana at the start of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, Ronaldo had played 10 matches in major tournaments and produced 33 shots without scoring.

Questions are growing around Ronaldo

The criticism was anything but quiet. Former France star Thierry Henry captured the issue in a blunt line during his analysis of the World Cup games: “It is the team that needs to score, not the individual.” He pointed to a moment when Ronaldo dropped deep instead of moving forward to create room for a team-mate, at a time when the side urgently needed to attack the goal rather than drift away from it.

An even more revealing judgement came from an opponent on the pitch. When asked whether there had been a specific plan to mark Ronaldo, Congo midfielder Ngalayel Mukau answered candidly: “We know he is no longer the player he once was, and that he has aged, but he remains one of the best players in history.”

Roberto Martinez, the former Portugal head coach, still did not go as far as taking him off despite all that. He defended that choice openly, saying: “It makes no sense to take off the all-time top scorer in a match where we badly need to score,” before adding that Ronaldo’s experience inside the penalty box “cannot be replaced.”

Dammam: Postecoglou’s boldness

Nearly two months later, in a very different setting, with his side reduced to 10 men and trailing 0-2, Postecoglou made the decision that Portugal’s coach had avoided. He removed Ronaldo completely from the equation and instead turned to Al-Khaibari and then Al-Hamdan in order to restore balance. The outcome backed him up: Sadio Mane scored twice, Al-Omari added a third, and Al-Nassr completed the turnaround to win 3-2.

That naturally raises a fair question. Was Postecoglou genuinely braver than Martinez, or were the two situations so different that comparing them does not really work? In Houston, Portugal needed a goal, and the only obvious option was to rely on Ronaldo’s long-established scoring pedigree.

In Dammam, Al-Nassr’s first need was to restore numerical balance. That was not about Ronaldo’s finishing ability at all; it was about his role on the pitch, as a player who does not contribute in pressing or defensive recovery phases.

Even with that context, the central point remains. This is the first time this season that a coach, in the middle of a real crisis, has decided that the path back into a game lies not through Ronaldo, but completely without him.

Powerful numbers: a decision that will fuel debate

Ronaldo gave Postecoglou little in the first half to make him hesitate. He managed only two shots, with one on target, and his efforts were worth just 0.05 on the expected goals scale, according to Sofascore.

His lack of involvement in the build-up was even more telling. He touched the ball only seven times, completed three of his five passes, and played just one ball into the attacking third. He created no chances and produced no key pass. Al-Nassr were already two goals behind and down a man from the 12th minute, desperately needing someone capable of influencing the match continuously. Across those first 45 minutes, Ronaldo did not provide that.

From a statistical point of view, then, taking him off at half-time made complete sense for Postecoglou. Whether it was the correct decision is another issue, and one supporters will continue to debate, especially because Al-Nassr went on to win the match.

Has the final chapter come into view? No clear answer yet

Ronaldo is 41, finding it difficult in Al-Nassr’s turbulent environment, and after a World Cup display that did not meet expectations, he seems to be moving towards a stage where the impact of time can no longer be dismissed.

It would still be too early to declare that the end has already begun. One game, or one substitution, cannot deliver a final verdict on a player who has spent his career proving people wrong. Nor is it fair to reduce Ronaldo’s ability to score and change matches to one passing moment.

But one thing has undeniably changed: the question itself no longer sounds absurd. For years, the idea of leaving Ronaldo out or substituting him during a match felt almost like an insult to his status. Now, coaches discuss his role and influence as a normal tactical matter, while doubts continue to grow over whether he can still produce the level the football world became accustomed to seeing from him.

Time does not stop, not even for the greatest stars. However long his journey on the pitch continues, Ronaldo cannot hold it back.

The more pressing question now is not whether he has reached the end, but when football itself will force him to accept that the version of Ronaldo the world once knew is no longer the same.