The Supreme Court clarified that Delhi and other states can close or withdraw FIRs against student protesters according to law, but protection will not apply to those involved in grave and heinous offences. The Court narrowed the meaning of “criminal antecedents” and directed authorities to distinguish serious crimes from minor cases while dealing with protest-related FIRs.
The Supreme Court on Aug 3 clarified that Delhi and other States are free to close or withdraw first information reports (FIRs), in accordance with law, against students involved in the recent protests, while excluding those with grave and heinous criminal antecedents from the protection.
A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana clarified its July 28 order after petitioners argued that the earlier direction could create hurdles in withdrawing cases against students. The Court said the expression “criminal antecedents” used in that order should be read as referring to “grave and heinous offences”, rather than petty offences or minor violations, Live Law and Bar & Bench report.
Relief For Students Facing Petty Cases
“It is clarified for July 28 order that NCT of Delhi and any other State shall be at liberty to close/withdraw FIRs against protesters. The word criminal antecedents is to be read as grave and heinous offences,” the Court said.
-
Tips can’t replace fares: TGPWU demands transparent fee structure

-
Munawar gets emotional after The Traitors 2 exit: ‘Kha jata…’

-
Top 10 | ABP LIVE Evening Bulletin: Top News Headlines from 13 August 2026 - Evening

-
Maharashtra govt to deploy Sarvam AI’s Indus for 2,500 officials

-
TMC set to move Supreme Court against its 20 rebel Lok Sabha MPs
