Top News

Folarin Balogun went from suspended to cleared in a World Cup plot twist that now involves a straight red card, FIFA’s disciplinary code, Belgium’s anger and President Donald Trump’s reported calls.

The United States striker was expected to miss Monday’s Round of 16 match against Belgium in Seattle after his red card against Bosnia and Herzegovina. Instead, FIFA suspended his one-game ban under Article 27, leaving Balogun eligible for the 8 p.m. ET kickoff and leaving Belgium asking the obvious question: how?

Why Folarin Balogun was suspended before FIFA used Article 27 to clear himBalogun’s suspension started in the 64th minute of the United States’ 2-0 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wednesday. He had scored the opening goal, his third of the tournament, when he challenged defender Tarik Muharemović and stepped on the back of his ankle.

Referee Raphael Claus did not initially call a foul. The play went to VAR, Claus reviewed it on the monitor and then showed Balogun a straight red card for serious foul play. Under World Cup rules, that usually means the player is sent off and automatically banned for the next match.



That is why this became a firestorm. FIFA and U.S. Soccer officials initially indicated the red-card suspension could not be appealed. Two days later, FIFA confirmed Balogun had to serve a one-match ban. Then Sunday happened.

FIFA said it had suspended the implementation of the match suspension under Article 27 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code . The red card still stays on Balogun’s record for a one-year probationary period. If he commits another similar offense in that time, the ban can be enforced.

That is not the same as saying the red card never happened. It means FIFA paused the punishment. That technical distinction is doing a lot of work.

Why Trump’s reported calls and Belgium’s anger made Balogun’s reversal explodeThe Guardian reported that Trump made three calls to FIFA, starting Wednesday, to push for the change. NBC News reported, citing a source familiar with the matter, that Trump called FIFA President Gianni Infantino and asked him to review Balogun’s suspension. FIFA has not said whether the call influenced its decision.

Trump celebrated anyway, writing, “Thank you to FIFA for doing what was right, and reversing a great injustice!”

That post turned an already strange disciplinary reversal into a political football story. U.S. head coach Mauricio Pochettino backed the outcome but rejected the idea that politics should decide soccer rulings.

“No, we cannot mix that. We cannot mix that,” Pochettino said Sunday, per ESPN. He also said the United States had been punished enough by playing with 10 men against Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Belgium did not treat this like a normal rules clarification. The Royal Belgian Football Association said it was “astonished” by FIFA’s decision and argued that a red card automatically brings a suspension for the next match. The federation said it is “investigating all potential options.”

Belgium’s problem is simple. Its staff spent most of the buildup preparing for a U.S. team without Balogun. Now the Americans get back their top World Cup scorer less than 24 hours before kickoff.

There is some precedent. FIFA used Article 27 to reduce Cristiano Ronaldo’s recent suspension, and ESPN noted that Nicolás Otamendi and Moisés Caicedo also had one-game bans deferred before the World Cup.

Balogun is not just any player. He has three goals in three starts and changes how Belgium defends the United States. If he scores Monday, the red-card debate will not stay in the rulebook. It will become part of the match.