Top News

Following the release of the CUET UG 2026 results, many students have raised questions regarding the normalization process. Many claim that the marks they calculated based on the provisional and final answer keys are significantly higher than what they actually received in the final results. Some students report a drop of 40 to 50 marks, while others mention even larger discrepancies. Students have lodged complaints with the National Testing Agency (NTA) and expressed their dissatisfaction on social media. They are demanding that the entire normalization process and the associated data be made public to ensure transparency in the results.

**Students Demand Transparency**
Students argue that the agency should clarify the difficulty levels of the papers across different shifts and explain the basis on which marks were increased or decreased for specific shifts. They claim that many students have seen a reduction of 40 to 50 marks, which has adversely affected their rankings and chances of admission to their preferred universities.

**What is the NTA's Stance?**
According to NTA sources, the CUET is conducted as a Computer-Based Test (CBT) over several days and across multiple shifts. There may be variations in the difficulty levels of question papers between these shifts. Normalization is implemented using a scientific method to balance these differences. In this process, some students' marks may increase, while others' may decrease.

**Key Demands of Students**
Students are demanding that all data related to the normalization process be made public. They want information regarding the number of candidates who appeared in each shift, the state-wise breakdown of students, and the percentage by which marks increased or decreased in each shift. They believe that applying the same process to both large and small examination centers is not appropriate.

**Expert Opinion**
Some education experts believe that if all question papers were designed to be of a uniform difficulty level, the necessity of the normalization process should be reconsidered. They suggest that to maintain the trust of students and parents, the NTA should review the complaints and make the process more transparent. Meanwhile, a female student claimed that she was scoring 815 marks according to the answer key, but received 710 marks in the final result. Similar cases have further heightened the students' concerns.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from Dainik Jagran. While we have made modifications for clarity and presentation, the original content belongs to its respective authors and website. We do not claim ownership of the content.