Top News

The Wrestling Federation of India has launched an urgent legal challenge in the Supreme Court against a recent judicial directive allowing Olympian Vinesh Phogat to contest the upcoming Asian Games trials. The national sporting body claims the previous ruling is unlawful, asserting that the judiciary has overstepped its boundaries by interfering with strict internal eligibility criteria.

The Critical Legal Basis of the Appeal

In its Special Leave Petition, the federation officially labeled the high court order as completely illegal. The governing body argued it was denied an adequate opportunity to present a detailed response before the directive was issued.

The administrative panel insists that inserting the athlete into the weekend trials directly violates established guidelines. They firmly believe that team selection for international multi-sport tournaments must remain the exclusive domain of national sports federations.

Anti-Doping Regulations Come In The Way

Providing crucial background to the ongoing dispute, the federation stated that the athlete had formally chosen to retire from professional wrestling back in December 2024. This was confirmed through official messages sent to the International Testing Agency.

According to global anti-doping regulations, any competitor returning from a period of retirement must undergo a mandatory six-month whereabouts tracking phase. This testing period must be completed before an individual becomes eligible to compete.

Unresolved Anti-Doping Procedures 

The federation also highlighted a recorded missed drug test connected to an unsuccessful testing attempt on December 18, 2025. This incident resulted in a formal show-cause notice being issued on May 9.

The governing council maintains that this specific disciplinary procedure is still active. They argue the ongoing inquiry must be allowed to reach its natural conclusion before the athlete can return to the mat.

No Special Exemptions Permitted Under Current Guidelines

The official selection criteria published in February contains absolutely no provisions for iconic athlete status or maternity exemptions. The federation reiterates that squad selection has always been based strictly on performance and merit.

A total of twelve wrestlers have already qualified for the trials through standard domestic championship routes. The petition notes these compliant athletes were never given a fair hearing by the high court.

Pressing Accreditation Deadline Constraints 

The national federation also submitted that the official accreditation deadline for the continental games had already expired on May 14. This logistical cutoff happened well before the high court issued its judgment.

The operational timing makes the implementation of the judicial instructions exceptionally difficult for tournament organisers. The entire sporting community now awaits the apex court's decision on this highly sensitive matter.