Top News

In their 2009 book, This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Carmen M Reinhart and Kenneth S Rogoff tell us that every generation believes its crisis is unique - and is always wrong. Until now, maybe. But for the wrong reasons.

Post-liberalisation, India's external sector was self-correcting. Today, what's different is not that the country faces external pressure, but that the shock absorbers that made prior recoveries possible are no longer functioning. There are 7 shock absorbers that have weakened simultaneously, of which 5 are structural, which won't reverse with the next Fed pivot or political cycle.

Yen funding architecture

Yen has undergone a regime change from a monetary funding instrument to a fiscal currency. Japan's 29-yr-high 10-yr bond yield confirms this transition is live. No successor funding currency exists. Dollar plays the opposite role, euro lacks a unified fiscal backstop, and renminbi requires permission. As a result, global carry capital has fragmented, not migrated.

Also read: A Rs 3 hike makes India’s inflation battle somewhat harder

Automatic EM allocation

For two decades, EM growth and diversification narrative - fast-growing economies with young demographics and expanding middle-classes deserve a structural overweight in global portfolios - directed capital toward India. That narrative has been displaced by AI super cycle.

Passive globalisation

Decades-long expansion of benchmark-driven EM flows is reversing under tariffs, friend-shoring and supply chain nationalisation.

Stable trade architecture

This is fragmenting under strategic industrial policy across 20 competing economies simultaneously, with WTO materially weakened, and bilateralism the new organising principle of global trade.

Also read: India buying Russian oil irrespective of US sanctions waivers, Indian official says

Secure Gulf energy flows

Three decades of cheap energy provided cyclical relief that made India's oil dependence manageable. The Strait of Hormuz closure did not create India's vulnerability, but exposed structural dependence masked for 35 yrs.

India's handling of its post-liberalisation external sector can be summarised in management of CAD, rather than elimination of its structural cause. Financing a deficit and eliminating its cause are not the same thing. Three decades of confusing the two is the original sin of India's external sector management.

The two cyclical absorbers - low global rates and valuation reset mechanism - are recoverable in principle. But not on any near-term horizon.

In every stress episode - 1997, 2008, 2013, 2020 - 3-4 absorbers were working. Simultaneous weakening has removed sequential self-correction those episodes relied upon. The transmission mechanism that once made India legible to global capital is now broken. Beneath India's nominal yield spread, two erosions took hold:

Inflation differential

India's inflation has run 4-5 percentage points above US inflation, making real yield spread far thinner than nominal number implied.

Hedging cost

Managing rupee currency risk runs at 4-5% annually. A foreign debt investor hedging government bond yield and paying hedging costs is left with a dollar return well below risk-free US treasury, which requires no hedging at all. For equity investors, after taxes and annual rupee depreciation of around 4%, a foreign investor earns less than 3% a year in dollar terms. The equity risk premium has turned negative.

When reserves are built through inflows rather than earnings, their apparent strength deserves a closer look. India's forex reserves - once covering 11 mths of imports - have declined to about 9 mths of cover. Reserve composition matters as much as aggregate size. Gold functions as a store of value but doesn't provide immediate intervention liquidity of US treasuries during periods of market stress.

Also read: India moves to buffer economy against Iran war fallout

India's reserves are substantial, but they are materially supported by reversible capital inflows rather than export earnings. That distinction matters when the cycle turns.

The mechanism that democratised Indian savings has also insulated markets from the correction that might have forced structural urgency. SIPs now channel crores into equities each month. With few alternative avenues, domestic savings remain trapped within the financial system, flowing into equities regardless of valuation. This captive capital has sustained premium valuations, making India unattractive to FPIs.

The problem is that the external operating environment changed faster than the structural transformation required to reduce India's dependence on imported energy and foreign capital. The answer is not financial. It's export competitiveness, energy transition and infrastructure that make efficiency the path of least resistance.

The writer is founder-director,Amarisa Capital Advisor