Top News

What $29 bn could have bought the US
ET Bureau | May 14, 2026 8:38 AM CST

Synopsis

The United States has allocated twenty-nine billion dollars for a conflict with Iran. This substantial sum could have funded numerous beneficial projects. Instead, the money is directed towards military hardware. The nation faces headlines and inflation as a result of this decision. Priorities dictate the allocation of such significant funds.

Listen to this article in summarized format

Loading...
×
So far, America has trotted up a decent bill for a war with no RoI
What does $29 bn buy you these days? In the US, it apparently buys a war against Iran - victory, never mind peace or even a decent press release, costing way extra. For the same price, one could acquire 29 bn McChickens (adding to America's obesity statistics). Or, fund every American's Netflix subscription until the end of time, ensuring the country fights only over who gets to skip the intro.

$29 bn could rebuild every pothole in America twice over - and maybe every gaddha in India at least once - with enough left to instal mood lighting on major thoroughfares. It could buy a controlling stake in Manchester United, even though it may not be the best buy. It could pay off the student loans of every humanities graduate and postgraduate, allowing them to finally afford artisanal macchiato while explaining why wars are absurd. Instead, the money has been spent on missiles, drones, and the privilege of discovering that Iran is a stubborn, sovereign state. Pentagon's and Lockheed Martin's accountants, no doubt, are thrilled: nothing balances a spreadsheet like a few billion vanishing into the blue. Sure, for $29 bn, the US could have purchased goodwill, infrastructure or - dare one say without coming across as a woke left-lib - universal healthcare. Instead, it has bought the US headlines, inflation, petro paranoia.... But priorities are priorities, right?


READ NEXT
Cancel OK