Top News

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (April 16) addressed the Lok Sabha during the debate on the Women’s Reservation Bill, invoking his own OBC background while referring to Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and MP Dharmendra Yadav.

In a pointed yet conversational remark, Modi described Akhilesh Yadav as his “friend” and said he occasionally extends support. At the same time, he underlined that his political approach is guided by the Constitution and the principle of inclusivity.

Speaking in the House, the Prime Minister said he comes from an extremely backward class but believes in taking everyone along as per constitutional values. He stressed that the country’s women would assess not just decisions but also the intent behind them.

Referring to earlier discussions on the Bill, Modi noted that there had been calls in 2023 for swift implementation. However, he said rolling it out in 2024 was not feasible, adding that 2029 presents a viable opportunity. He urged lawmakers to avoid further delays, calling it a matter of urgency.

#WATCH | Speaking in Lok Sabha on women's reservation and delimitation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi says, "Dharmendra Yadav (Samajwadi Party MP) ji, I am very grateful to you for introducing me. It's true, I come from a very backward community. Akhilesh ji is my friend, so he… pic.twitter.com/qCjPfygujD

— ANI (@ANI) April 16, 2026

Warning to Opponents of Women’s Quota

Modi also issued a political warning, stating that parties opposing women’s reservation have historically faced electoral consequences. He remarked that whenever the issue has surfaced in past elections, voters, particularly women, have not forgiven those who resisted it.

He added that the situation differed in the 2024 elections as the Bill was passed unanimously, removing it as a point of contention.

Calling for unity, the Prime Minister said that if all parties come together, the outcome would strengthen India’s democracy rather than benefit any single political group. He emphasised that the credit would belong collectively to the nation, not to the treasury benches or any individual leader.