Top News

• The Supreme Court granted divorce under Article 142 in a case that has been going on since 1994.
• The husband directed the wife to pay a lump sum of Rs 1 crore as alimony and Rs 90 lakh for property distribution.
• The court quashed 61 pending cases and ended all disputes between the two parties.

While the Supreme Court disposed of 61 cases in a single hearing, 32 were initiated a year ago of divorce A final decision has been given on the petition. Justice B. V. A bench of Justice Nagaratna and Justice Ujjwal Bhuyan granted divorce to the husband and wife invoking the privilege under Article 142 of the Constitution. Both the parties have been separated for a long time in this ongoing case since 1994. The Bench first took detailed note of the arguments of both the parties. Later they adopted the path of discussion to resolve their differences.

Raghav Chadha News : Raghav Chadha deletes all anti-Modi posts; Saurabh Bhardwaj did pollhole with screenshots

Both decided to go ahead with the divorce proceedings by mutual consent, the order issued by the court clarified, with the husband agreeing to pay a lump sum maintenance of Rs one crore to the wife. It has also directed to deposit Rs. 90 lakhs in the account of the petitioners as share of property.

Reduction in number of pending cases:

The Supreme Court has also set aside all judicial orders passed by various courts in this matter.

All disputes between both parties are over

This decision has put an end to all disputes between the two parties. The court has given a clear order that henceforth no party shall file a civil or criminal suit. The Supreme Court has quashed 61 cases pending in various courts across the country, including complaints to misappropriation and property disputes, which have been pending in high courts, lower courts and the Supreme Court.

LPG Shortage News : “LPG and fuel supply stable, action against violators…”, HPCL statement

Settlement of property disputes through discussion

The background to the case is that the case initially reached the Supreme Court as a contempt of court case. In January and February hearings, the court heard arguments from both sides, first ascertained whether a divorce was required, then settled the property dispute, with both parties stating in writing that they would fully accept the court’s decision.

Disclaimer: This is an automated news feed of Navrastra newspaper. It is not edited by navarashtra.com staff.